Transportation Company Cuts Contract Review Delays

A high-volume contracts team needed to replace slow manual processes with a faster, trackable workflow that reduced legal bottlenecks.
Header image
Challenges
100+ contracts

in legal review queue creating multi-month execution delays

71 days

average on-hold time for service requests blocking vendor approvals

0

automated contract workflows or approval tracking systems

"We were having so many issues trying to get things through legal review. The roadblocks were getting deeper and deeper, and we often forgot that we'd negotiated with vendors three years ago and changed specific language."

Contract Manager

Challenge

A major US transportation and logistics corporation with 60+ corporate departments faced a contract management crisis that threatened operational efficiency across the organization. The marketing department alone managed over 1,000 legacy contracts using manual processes—spreadsheets, email negotiations, and basic document repositories—creating version control nightmares that the team described as "very dicey" to track.

Multiple stakeholders touching the same contracts made it nearly impossible to determine which version was current. The organization often forgot terms negotiated with vendors years prior, forcing repetitive work and creating inconsistency. A single legal counsel managed contract reviews across the entire organization, with over 100 agreements awaiting attention—delays measured in months rather than weeks.

Manual processes extended throughout the contract-to-payment lifecycle. The contracts team manually extracted payment terms from executed agreements and copied them into emails for the accounts payable department. With no automated tracking, the team maintained separate systems to reconcile payments against contractual obligations. Historical contract data scattered across SharePoint and Box lacked robust search capabilities, requiring manual document review to extract specific data points—work that could consume hours or days.

Knowledge transfer challenges compounded the problem. Contracts sometimes went to legal review only to discover clauses the business team thought were acceptable actually weren't. With contract playbooks constantly evolving, the trial-and-error process created workflow inefficiencies and eroded confidence.

A previous evaluation of Cobblestone CLM had failed spectacularly. The vendor provided system access without adequate guidance or training, leaving users struggling without hands-on support. Metadata extraction demos from multiple vendors either missed critical fields, pulled incorrect data, or required extensive manual re-tagging across 1,000+ documents—dealbreakers that sent the organization back to square one.

Solution Search

Why Leah

The company selected Leah comprehensive CLM platform after identifying it as a market leader through independent Gartner research. The solution addressed their core requirements through several key capabilities:

AI-Powered Intelligence: Automated metadata extraction with plain English clause summaries enabled faster contract review without constant legal escalation. The system's historical precedent surfacing helped business teams understand previously negotiated terms with the same vendors, eliminating guesswork in negotiations.

Comprehensive Workflow Automation: Configurable approval workflows with automated routing and sign-off tracking provided the governance controls the organization needed. Visual workflow designers and relationship hierarchy features made it easy to understand contract routing across business review, legal approval, negotiation, and signature stages.

Repository and Search Capabilities: AI-powered search that could answer specific queries across hundreds of contracts represented a fundamental advantage. The platform's document findability solved the core question: why invest in a repository if you cannot find your documents?

Payment Terms Extraction: Automated extraction of payment terms, net terms, and fee structures eliminated the manual copy-paste workflow to accounts payable, streamlining the entire contract-to-payment process.

No-Code Configurability: The platform's flexibility allowed the contracts team to adapt workflows as processes evolved, without requiring costly change orders or IT resources.

Translation and Global Support: Built-in translation capabilities for 115+ languages, including French Canadian, exceeded requirements for their global operations.

Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with existing DocuSign e-signature workflows and Outlook email systems preserved investments in current tools while adding comprehensive CLM capabilities.

"We reduced legal review time by 91% for service requests and cut software request reviews by 71% in a single quarter. The system eliminates hours of manual contract review that used to take days."

Contract Manager

Outcome

Within one year of implementation, the organization achieved dramatic operational improvements across nearly all contract workflow stages. Legal review times dropped 91% for service requests—from 11 days to just one day—and decreased 71% for software requests, falling from 38 days to 11 days. Business review cycles improved 54% for software requests, and NDA negotiation times decreased 29%. Most notably, the organization completely eliminated the 71-day average on-hold status that had previously blocked service requests.