Contract Repapering.
From years to weeks.
When new regulations land, Leah identifies every affected contract, drafts amendments aligned to the new rule, and tracks repapering through countersignature. Portfolio-scale legal work, at the speed of regulation.
Regulators move in months. Manual repapering moves in years.
Regulatory changes affect thousands of contracts
DORA, GDPR amendments, sanctions packages, sectoral rules. Each new regulation cascades through the supplier base, the customer portfolio, and intra-group agreements. The blast radius is rarely understood at the time the rule is published.
Manual identification takes weeks
Legal teams open contracts one by one, search for clauses, build spreadsheets. By the time the affected population is mapped, the compliance deadline is already closer than the work is finished.
Amendment drafting is inconsistent across attorneys
Five lawyers drafting amendments for the same regulation produce five subtly different clauses. Counterparties spot the inconsistency, negotiations stall, and the legal position fragments across the portfolio.
Counterparty negotiation tracking is ad hoc
Spreadsheets, shared inboxes, status emails. Someone always knows where one deal stands, but no one has a clean portfolio view of what is signed, what is in negotiation, and what is silently overdue.
Audit trail of what changed and why is fragmented
Regulators ask which contracts were amended, against which rule, on which date, and why. The answer lives across email threads, document versions, and the memories of attorneys who may have moved on.
Repapering programs run for years
Major regulatory waves spawn multi-year repapering projects with rotating staff and consulting fees that compound. By the time the program ends, the next regulation is already in flight.
Continuous monitoring of the rules that govern your contracts
Leah watches the regulatory feeds that matter to your business. Financial regulators, data protection authorities, sanctions lists, sectoral rules, and trade bodies. New rules and amendments are surfaced the day they publish, mapped to the contract types and clauses they affect.
“We used to find out about regulatory changes when our compliance lead read about them. Now Leah surfaces them with the contracts already mapped to the new rule.”
Chief Legal Officer, European Bank
Five steps from rule publication to countersigned amendment
Leah integrates with the systems you already run. No rip and replace. Value from the first regulatory wave.
Connect
Leah integrates with your CLM, document repository, and contract metadata systems. The full agreement portfolio becomes searchable at clause level without migrating off your current platforms.
Detect Changes
Regulatory feeds, gazettes, sanctions lists, and sectoral rules are monitored continuously. New rules and amendments are surfaced and mapped to the contract categories they affect.
Identify Affected Contracts
Each detected rule triggers a portfolio-wide clause-level scan. The output is a structured population of agreements with confidence scores and the specific clauses that need amendment.
Generate Amendments
Leah drafts amendment language aligned to the firm's playbook, tailored to each counterparty, and consistent across the portfolio. Attorney review is reserved for genuinely bespoke cases.
Track Progress
Status by counterparty, by regulation, and by deadline. Every action is logged with full audit trail, ready for the regulator on demand.
Got Questions? Get Answers.
Leah tracks the regulatory feeds most relevant to enterprise contract portfolios: financial services (DORA, MiFID, Basel), data protection (GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA, sectoral US privacy laws), sanctions (OFAC, EU, UK, UN consolidated lists), trade and tariffs, and sectoral rules across pharma, energy, and financial services. New feeds are added as customer demand surfaces, and customers can configure their own monitored sources.
Leah reads contracts as structured legal documents, not text blobs. Clauses are extracted, classified, and indexed by obligation category. When a regulation triggers a scan, Leah matches the rule against the actual obligation language, with semantic understanding of the clause type. A surface keyword search would miss agreements that use different terminology for the same obligation. Leah does not.
No. Leah drafts amendments and queues them for attorney review. Sending to counterparties is a deliberate human action. Once sent, Leah tracks the negotiation, captures returned versions, and surfaces blockers, but the decision to send always sits with your team. The same applies to countersignature, which goes through your existing signing workflow.
Leah pre-positions counterparty-aware fallbacks based on past negotiations and known counterparty positions. When a counterparty pushes back, Leah surfaces the next acceptable position from the playbook, with attorney approval before sending. The negotiation history is captured automatically and feeds future drafts, so the playbook gets sharper with every wave.
Yes. Leah supports multi-jurisdictional portfolios and multi-language contracts, with regulatory mapping scoped to the jurisdictions that apply to each agreement. Local counsel still owns the legal sign-off in each jurisdiction, but the identification, drafting, and tracking layer is unified across the program.
Every amendment carries the triggering regulation, the affected clause, the draft history, the attorney sign-off, the counterparty correspondence, and the countersigned final version. When a regulator asks for evidence of compliance with a specific rule, the export is a single bundle per affected contract, with full chronology. Customers report that audit prep that used to take weeks now takes hours.
