DPIA Reports.
Consistent, defensible, audit-ready.
Leah collects context from data inventories, processing records, and product specs. She auto-drafts DPIAs per ICO and EDPB guidance, flags high-risk processing for DPO review, and maintains the live register.
DPIAs are required by law. Most are written reactively and inconsistently.
DPIA quality varies wildly across the business
One business unit produces a thorough Article 35 assessment. Another submits a half-page checklist. Without a consistent methodology, regulators see exactly the gaps that invite scrutiny, and internal stakeholders lose trust in the process.
Privacy team chases input from product, legal, and engineering
Every DPIA requires context the privacy team does not own. Data flows live in engineering. Purposes and lawful bases live with product. Contracts live with legal. The DPO becomes a project manager chasing meetings instead of assessing risk.
High-risk processing identified late
By the time a DPIA is triggered, the processing activity is often already live. Article 35 requires assessment before processing begins. Reactive DPIAs leave the business exposed to regulator findings and prior consultation requirements.
DPIA register fragmented and out of date
DPIAs sit in shared drives, ticketing tools, and email threads. There is no single register a regulator can be shown. When the supervisory authority asks for the inventory, the privacy team scrambles to assemble it from memory.
Counterparty data flows undocumented
Personal data flows to processors, sub-processors, and joint controllers under DPAs and SCCs. Mapping which contract governs which flow, and whether transfer mechanisms are valid, is a manual reconstruction every time a DPIA is updated.
Audit prep is a manual fire drill
Supervisory authority audits and ICO inquiries demand evidence on demand. Pulling together processing records, DPIAs, risk decisions, and mitigation status across the organization is weeks of work the privacy team cannot afford.
Auto-discover where personal data actually flows
Leah reads your data inventory, processing records, system documentation, and product specs to map every place personal data is collected, stored, transferred, or processed. Each processing activity is structured against the Article 30 record format, with categories of data, data subjects, recipients, and lawful bases captured automatically.
“The first time we ran Leah we discovered processing activities our RoPA had never captured. The discovery layer alone gave us a defensible inventory we did not have before.”
Group DPO, Multinational Insurer
Five steps to a continuous DPIA program
Leah integrates with the systems you already run. No rip and replace. Value from the first processing activity assessed.
Connect
Leah integrates with your data inventory, RoPA tooling, CLM, ticketing systems, and product documentation. Privacy context flows into a single intelligence layer without replacing your existing systems.
Discover Processing
Every processing activity is mapped to the Article 30 format, with data categories, recipients, retention, transfer mechanisms, and lawful bases captured from primary sources.
Classify Risk
Each activity is scored against Article 35 triggers and ICO and EDPB criteria. High-risk processing automatically opens a DPIA workflow before launch.
Draft DPIA
Leah drafts each DPIA against the supervisory authority methodology, with mitigation controls mapped to residual risks. The DPO reviews and approves a structured draft.
Maintain Register
Every DPIA joins a live register. Changes to processing trigger reviews automatically. Audit and regulator requests are answered from a single source of truth.
Got Questions? Get Answers.
Leah drafts DPIAs against the ICO sample template and EDPB Article 35 guidance, including the supervisory authority lists for high-risk processing. UK processing reflects ICO criteria, EU processing reflects EDPB criteria, and the rationale for risk classification is documented per activity. Where residual risk remains high after mitigation, Leah flags the activity for prior consultation under Article 36.
No. Leah operates on top of your existing data inventory, RoPA tooling, CLM, and ticketing systems. Records of processing, contracts, and system documentation continue to live where they live today. Leah reads from those systems, runs the discovery and classification layer, and writes back DPIAs, risk decisions, and review tasks. There is no rip-and-replace.
Every DPIA is tied to the underlying processing activity, the contracts that govern processors, and the systems that implement the processing. When any of those change, Leah opens a review task automatically and surfaces the affected DPIA to the DPO. The register stays live with the business rather than freezing at the moment of approval.
Yes. Joint-controller arrangements, processor and sub-processor relationships, DPAs, SCCs, and supplementary measures are all mapped against the processing activities they govern. Cross-border transfer mechanisms are validated, and where transfer impact assessments are required, Leah produces them as part of the DPIA package.
Most privacy teams see the discovery layer surface activities outside the existing RoPA within the first 30 days. Risk classification across the inventory typically completes inside the first quarter, and auto-drafted DPIAs begin landing for DPO review at the same time. The live register becomes the answer to audit and regulator requests from day one of go-live.
Yes. Leah is deployed by regulated insurers, banks, and healthcare groups with strict data protection requirements. Customer data does not train Leah's underlying models. Data is encrypted in transit and at rest. SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA-ready, and ISO 27001 aligned. Private instance deployment is available for customers with strict data isolation requirements.
