NDA Review.
Every agreement, your playbook, in minutes.
Leah reviews every NDA against your playbook, generates redlines with rationale, or routes pre-approved templates when the terms align. The legal team stops being the NDA bottleneck.
NDAs are the highest-volume, most repetitive work in legal. They should not be the bottleneck.
NDAs eat senior attorney time
The most expensive lawyers in the company spend hours each week reviewing the most repetitive agreements in the company. Liability cap, scope, term, jurisdiction. The same review, again and again, on work that should never reach the GC.
Inconsistent redlining across the team
Two attorneys reviewing the same NDA produce two different redlines. One pushes back on indemnity, the other lets it through. The playbook lives in everyone's head differently, and counterparties learn which lawyer to wait for.
Pre-approved templates ignored
Legal published a clean template months ago. Sales emails it to a counterparty, the counterparty sends back their paper, and review starts from scratch. The template that should have closed the loop never gets used in practice.
Bottleneck slows the sales cycle
An NDA that sits for three days delays the discovery call, the proposal, and ultimately the close. Sales leadership measures the legal team by how often deals stall in review. Legal never set out to be the bottleneck, but the queue says otherwise.
Counterparty terms slip through unnoticed
Buried in a 12-page mutual NDA, a counterparty inserts a five-year confidentiality tail or a non-solicit clause. Under volume pressure, even good attorneys miss it. The signed version commits the company to terms nobody surfaced.
No portfolio view of NDA exposure
Legal can produce any single NDA on request, but cannot answer the portfolio questions. How many active NDAs does the company hold? Which counterparties have unusual terms? Where are the long tails of confidentiality still running? The data is there, just not surfaced.
Your playbook, encoded once, applied every time
Leah ingests your NDA playbook, the liability caps you accept, the confidentiality scope you require, the jurisdiction preferences you push for, and the terms you reject. Every incoming NDA is analyzed against that playbook clause by clause, with confidence scores and rationale for each judgment.
“We spent years writing playbooks that nobody used at the moment of review. Leah is the first thing that turned the playbook into the actual review, every time.”
General Counsel, Industrial Manufacturer
Five steps to autonomous NDA review
Leah integrates with the systems you already run. No new portal, no behavior change for the business. Value from the first week.
Connect Inbound Channels
Leah plugs into the inbound channels NDAs already arrive through. Email aliases, sales tools, the legal intake form, the CLM. No new portal, no behavior change for the rest of the business.
Apply Playbook
Every NDA is checked clause by clause against your playbook. Liability cap, scope, term, jurisdiction, indemnity, non-solicit, and any custom rules your team has codified.
Generate Redlines or Route Template
Where redlines are needed, they are generated with rationale and ready for attorney validation. Where the inbound aligns with your standard, your pre-approved template is routed instead.
Route for Approval
Routine NDAs queue for fast attorney sign-off. Non-standard agreements escalate to senior counsel or the GC, with a structured summary and recommended position.
Track Portfolio
Every signed NDA enters the portfolio. Terms structured, expirations tracked, cross-counterparty patterns surfaced. Legal gains a portfolio view of NDA exposure for the first time.
Got Questions? Get Answers.
Leah scores every NDA on risk and deviation count. Routine agreements clear autonomously after attorney validation. Non-standard agreements, the ones with unusual jurisdictions, long confidentiality tails, non-solicit clauses, or liability caps outside your range, are flagged with the specific deviations called out and routed to senior counsel or the GC for human judgment. Leah does not pretend to handle everything autonomously. She handles the routine cases well, so attorneys can focus on the genuinely exceptional ones.
Yes. Leah operates alongside your existing CLM, whether that is a major enterprise platform or a lighter system. Leah ingests NDAs from intake channels, runs the analysis and redlining, and writes the signed agreement and structured terms back to the CLM. The CLM remains the system of record, Leah is the intelligence layer on top of it. There is no rip-and-replace and no disruption to existing legal workflows.
Leah ingests your existing playbook documents, your standard NDA template, and your historical redlines. From those inputs she structures the rules, the liability caps you accept, the scope language you require, the term lengths you push for, and the terms you reject. The legal team reviews and refines the structured rules in plain language before activation. As deals progress and edge cases emerge, the playbook updates without code changes.
Across deployments, attorneys accept Leah's redlines without modification roughly nine times out of ten. The remaining tenth is typically a substantive judgment call rather than a generation error, the kind of decision an attorney would have made during their own review. Every redline carries the playbook rule it enforces and a confidence score, so the attorney is validating reasoning, not authoring from scratch.
Most legal teams see Leah autonomously routing NDAs within two weeks of playbook ingestion. The first week is playbook structuring and validation with the legal team. The second week is shadow mode, where Leah generates redlines for human review without sending. By the start of the third week, routine NDAs are clearing autonomously after attorney sign-off, and the time savings begin to compound.
Escalation is driven by configurable thresholds your legal team owns. Liability caps above a threshold, certain clause types like non-solicit or non-compete, confidentiality tails over a certain length, or unusual jurisdictions all trigger escalation. The escalation reaches the assigned senior attorney or GC with a one-page structured summary, the specific deviations called out, and a recommended position. Escalations come with context, not just a flag, so the senior reviewer makes the call quickly.
